Let’s say that a compliance platform costs $12,000 annually. Does that sound like a lot?
It’s dependent on the part you are replacing.
Automating the gathering of evidence across a complex technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious work, then $12,000 is a wise investment. If a company of seven could have the same evidence in the space of a few hours every month, the amount differs.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Do not begin by asking which platform offers the greatest features. Determine how many hours and time these features can save your business.
The Break-Even point for automation
Automating compliance isn’t inherently beneficial or harmful. The benefit of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company with multiple cloud environments as well as multiple applications. The manual process of gathering evidence can cause a significant operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and record evidence easily justify the expense.
Consider a startup with 10 employees working on their first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees working on its first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. A high-end platform can offer substantial capabilities, but those capabilities can only provide financial value in the event that an organization really requires them.
Compare Architecture not just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a debate which can be easily a feature by feature exercise. Both platforms are based on automation and integration companies that are looking to adopt this approach can benefit from comparing the frameworks supported along with their integrations and services, as well as individual quotations and contracts.
It’s important to choose an additional thing before you do. Does your business want an integration-driven platform for compliance or not? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and automated evidence gathering. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the Same Model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete in an identical category that is focused on automation. On the market, there are platforms with a simpler design that focus more on system organization and connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance experts. It organizes controls for frameworks into a single work space and gives editable guidance on policies and evidence. Auditors are able to review the evidence through a restricted interface.
It deliberately does not connect to operating systems, nor install infrastructure agents. Customers can upload evidence that they choose.
System Access is a consideration in the Making
Removing integrations has an obvious disadvantage: one must collect evidence manually.
This removes the requirement for integration and the application of compliance is not dependent on a connection to the operational environment.
The designs of either are not superior to the other. The key question is what choice is best to your business.
CertAssist is aimed at teams of roughly five to 200 people and publishes its pricing instead of requiring an initial sales call to determine the beginning price. Its advertised launch price is $225 per month, as opposed to the regular cost of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today might not be the same when you have 100 or even 500 employees.
While compliance is straightforward an easy platform can make sense. As employees, systems, frameworks, and evidence requirements expand, the economics may eventually favor deeper automation. It is better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
Do not pay for 50 integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. Spend money on them when manually doing the work they replace becomes the most expensive option.