Imagine a compliance platform costs $12,000 per year. Does that sound expensive?
What it replaces will decide the answer.
Automating the gathering of evidence in a complicated technology-driven environment will eliminate hundreds of hours of repetitive work then $12,000 could be a well-spent amount of money. If a small business with seven employees could have similar evidence in just a couple of hours every month, the cost will be different.
It’s an effective way to start the search for Vanta. Identifying the platform with the most advanced features isn’t the first step. Ask what those features will save your company in actual time and energy.
Automated Manufacturing Has a Break-Even Level
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a company in the field of technology which is growing, several cloud environments, a variety of applications and frequent changes in access. Manually collecting evidence could be a major operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence could easily justify the cost.
Imagine a small-scale business of 10 employees preparing for its initial SOC 2 audit. Consider a startup with 10 employees working on its first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. While an advanced platform could have many features but they only have value only when an organization is in need of them.
Compare Architecture, Not Just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a comparison which can be easily a feature by feature exercise. Both are reputable solutions for compliance based on automation and integrations. Hence, looking at their supported frameworks including integrations, service contracts, and individual quotes are useful for businesses searching for that method.
You’ll need to decide on an additional thing before you do. Do you require a Compliance platform that integrates? Some businesses want automated evidence collection and constant monitoring. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence by themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do not all follow the Same Model
Several well-known Vanta competitors have a place in the market, with a similar focus on automation. The market also has lighter platforms designed around the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the second group. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a single workstation, offers editable policies and evidence guidelines, and permits auditors to look over evidence via restricted access.
It is not able to connect to operational systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers decide to upload the proof they wish to provide.
It is important to consider the access to the system.
Removal of integrations has its limitations: one must manually gather evidence.
It also removes the need for integration setup and this means that the compliance application does not require connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. It is essential to consider what choices make sense for your particular business.
CertAssist is targeted at companies that comprise between five and 200 people and offers pricing information rather than having to have an actual sales call. The advertised price of launch for CertAssist is $225 monthly rather than an average of $375.
Let Complexity Get Its Due
The requirements of a 10 person startup today won’t necessarily be its needs when it has 100 or 500 employees.
Although compliance is easy A lightweight platform could be a good idea. The economics of automation can be increased as systems, employees and frameworks grow. It’s better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
The cost of purchasing fifty integrations simply because they look great in a comparison table is not a good idea. They are worth paying for to perform the tasks they take over is more costly than manually performing them.